|
The
Glass Palace
by
Amitav Ghosh
|
|

Review
by Aparita
|
Anthropologically
inclined academic turned writer Amitav Ghosh's latest work,
The Glass Palace, may seem like a daunting task to embark
upon, as indeed it is. However, it is a task that is well-worth
undertaking. As you read the five hundred odd pages of a
meticulously researched history that spans nearly two centuries
and several countries, you will be taken on a voyage that
will give you a sense of the epic proportion of the material
that Ghosh is dealing with. In doing so, Ghosh invariably
addresses several issues that are nascent to the writings
of an academic such as himself.
The novel opens introducing us to one of the main characters,
Rajkumar Raha. We see the world through the eyes of the
precocious eleven-year-old boy who is left to fend for himself
as he watches the disintegration of his family, the British
invasion of Mandalay that brings about the collapse of the
royal family of Burma and, towards the end of the novel,
the crumbling of a nation that was once known as the 'golden
land'. The Glass Palace then follows the meteoric rise and
fall of Rajkumar, who establishes a flourishing teak industry
business with the help of his half Chinese mentor Saya John
and his son Matthew, and embarks on a mission to find Dolly,
one of the child attendants of Queen Supalayat. Since the
royal family had been sent to exile in Goa, Rajkumar follows
the trail and marries Dolly, with some assistance from Uma,
the wife of the District Collector of Goa. Uma gets involved
with the Indian independence movement. Rajkumar and Matthew
enter the rubber plantation business under guidance of Saya
John. Years pass and various offspring are produced. Not
entirely unexpectedly, the paths of the two generations
cross. In fact you can understand why the novel has come
under some attacks that call it a "middlebrow family saga";
but the novel is much more than that.
Amongst other issues, The Glass Palace raises the issue
of dislocation by imbuing it with political and social realities
that afflicted India and her southeast neighbors at the
time of the downfall of the British Empire. In doing so,
Ghosh opens a can of worms that is not often dealt with
in current Indo-Anglian literature - the complicity of India
with the imperialistic operations of Britain. Just as he
deals with the racism faced by the Indian officers of the
Indian Army under British rule through the characters of
Arjun and Hardy, Ghosh also deals with the problems that
the Indian Army faced when fighting 'Indians' in Malaya.
By dealing with such uncomfortable parts of the Indian history
Ghosh treads those paths that we usually ignore when we
deal with the history of India in relation to it's struggle
for independence. The interesting part about this questioning
is that Ghosh deals with the history of Southeast Asia,
an area that South Asian writing has not yet explored fully
despite the strong links between the two.
Blurring boundaries between nations and between fact and
fiction, while questioning the standard history that we
are brought up, Ghosh does not hesitate to meander from
the track and gives us vistas of vivid descriptions of Burma
and Calcutta, a testament to his journalistic eye, whether
it be the painful account of diseased elephant or the pomp
and splendor of Neel and Manju's marriage. In the midst
of the expansive details, however, epic moments of global
history are dealt with within a few sentences, immediately
drawing back the reader into the action of the story.
If you have a few languid afternoons to spare and someone
to dole out endless cups of chai, this is a book that you
can curl up with. The straightforward narrative will tell
you a story that asks a lot of questions and leave you asking
a lot of questions, which is the point of good book.
|